Key result
Continuous glucose monitoring provided clinically acceptable estimates of capillary blood glucose during exercise, although significant differences were found in 3 out of 6 tests.
Why the study?
Does continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) accurately estimate capillary blood glucose during continuous and high-intensity interval exercise in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus?
Observational (n=7)
Does continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) accurately estimate capillary blood glucose during continuous and high-intensity interval exercise in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus?
CGM provides clinically acceptable glucose estimates during most exercise intensities in T1DM patients, though capillary blood glucose checks are still recommended during intense continuous exercise.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not yet change exercise glucose monitoring; leaves open CGM accuracy validation in larger trials.
Continuous exercise (CON) and high-intensity interval exercise (HIIE) can be safely performed with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Additionally, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems may serve as a tool to reduce the risk of exercise-induced hypoglycemia. It is unclear if CGM is accurate during CON and HIIE at different mean workloads. Seven T1DM patients performed CON and HIIE at 5% below (L) and above (M) the first lactate turn point (LTP₁), and 5% below the second lactate turn point (LTP₂) (H) on a cycle ergometer. Glucose was measured via CGM and in capillary blood (BG). Differences were found in comparison of CGM vs. BG in three out of the six tests (p < 0.05). In CON, bias and levels of agreement for L, M, and H were found at: 0.85 (-3.44, 5.15) mmol·L(-1), -0.45 (-3.95, 3.05) mmol·L(-1), -0.31 (-8.83, 8.20) mmol·L(-1) and at 1.17 (-2.06, 4.40) mmol·L(-1), 0.11 (-5.79, 6.01) mmol·L(-1), 1.48 (-2.60, 5.57) mmol·L(-1) in HIIE for the same intensities. Clinically-acceptable results (except for CON H) were found. CGM estimated BG to be clinically acceptable, except for CON H. Additionally, using CGM may increase avoidance of exercise-induced hypoglycemia, but usual BG control should be performed during intense exercise.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moser et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (n=7). Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) vs. Capillary blood glucose (BG) was evaluated on Differences between CGM and capillary blood glucose during exercise (p=<0.05). Continuous glucose monitoring provided clinically acceptable estimates of capillary blood glucose during exercise, although significant differences were found in 3 out of 6 tests.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: