Why the study?
Does continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) accurately estimate capillary blood glucose during continuous and high-intensity interval exercise in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus?
Population
7 patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
Comparison
Continuous glucose monitoring during continuous… vs Capillary blood glucose (BG) measurement
Design
Cross-sectional
Key result
Continuous glucose monitoring provided clinically acceptable estimates of capillary blood glucose during exercise, although significant differences were found in 3 out of 6 tests (p<0.05).
Authors
Loading...
Should not yet change exercise glucose monitoring; leaves open CGM accuracy validation in larger trials.
Observational (n=7)
Does continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) accurately estimate capillary blood glucose during continuous and high-intensity interval exercise in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus?
p-value: p=<0.05
CGM provides clinically acceptable glucose estimates during most exercise intensities in T1DM patients, though capillary blood glucose checks are still recommended during intense continuous exercise.
Moser et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (n=7). Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) vs. Capillary blood glucose (BG) was evaluated on Differences between CGM and capillary blood glucose during exercise (p=<0.05). Continuous glucose monitoring provided clinically acceptable estimates of capillary blood glucose during exercise, although significant differences were found in 3 out of 6 tests (p<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: