In vitro experimental study demonstrates that soy protein isolate optimizes texture, stability, and intestinal digestibility in mycelium meat analogues, suggesting effective pork mimicry.
Pleuroutus geesteranus mycelia were used as the primarily raw material to develop meat analogues, and the effects of quality-enhancing additives (soy protein isolate, carrageenan, and egg white protein) on their properties were systematically evaluated. Mycelium-only meat analogues exhibited poor texture, while quality-enhancing additives significantly enhanced appearance and texture in a concentration-dependent manner. Meat analogues containing 25 g/100 g soy protein isolate (MA-S), 1.6 g/100 g carrageenan (MA-C), and 20 g/100 g egg white protein (MA-E) best mimicked pork products. Among them, MA-S showed the highest freeze-thaw stability and lowest cooking loss, attributed to its dense and uniform gel network. In contrast, MA-C had the weakest structure and was prone to damage. MA-E formed a relatively loose microstructure, resulting in intermediate performance. Microstructural differences among the samples were closely linked to variations in texture and digestibility. MA-S achieved the most favorable overall texture profile among the three formulations, including hardness, springiness, cohesiveness, gumminess, chewiness, and resilience. During the gastric digestion phase, MA-S and MA-E exhibited more protein bands than MA-C; during the intestinal phase, all three samples were rapidly hydrolyzed into peptides smaller than 14.3 kDa within 15 minutes, with MA-S showing the faintest bands. • Pleurotus geesteranus mycelium is an ideal raw material to prepare meat analogues. • Quality-enhancing additives significantly enhance the quality additives of meat analogues. • Mycelium-based meat analogues with quality-enhancing additives can resemble pork product. • Meat analogues with soy protein isolate have better texture. • The digestive behavior of meat analogues depends on their microstructures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: