Key result
Implementation of a VTE protocol within a clerking proforma for acute surgical admissions increased appropriate VTE prophylaxis from 37% to 88% (p<0.001).
Why the study?
Does a VTE prevention protocol within a clerking proforma improve appropriate thromboprophylaxis in acute surgical admissions?
Population
111 acutely admitted surgical inpatients (51 in Round 1, 60 in Round 2) at a district general hospital.
Comparison
VTE prevention protocol incorporating risk… vs Standard practice prior to protocol…
Design
Cohort
Authors
Loading...
May enhance VTE prophylaxis in acute surgical admissions; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective trials before practice change.
Does a VTE prevention protocol within a clerking proforma improve appropriate thromboprophylaxis in acute surgical admissions?
Absolute Event Rate: 88% vs 37%
p-value: p=<0.001
Implementing a VTE protocol within a surgical clerking proforma significantly improves the rate of appropriate thromboprophylaxis in acute surgical admissions.
McKenna et al. (2008) studied Venous thromboembolism prevention (n=111). VTE prevention protocol within a clerking proforma vs. Usual care (pre-intervention audit) was evaluated on Appropriate VTE prophylaxis (p=<0.001). Implementation of a VTE protocol within a clerking proforma for acute surgical admissions increased appropriate VTE prophylaxis from 37% to 88% (p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: