Randomized double-blind trial reveals improved motor scores with citicoline add-on therapy in Parkinson's disease, suggesting potential as a safe supportive treatment.
Background Citicoline is a promising therapeutic option for improving both motor and non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD) beyond levodopa and other standard dopaminergic treatments. Objectives The CITIPARK study evaluated the efficacy and safety of citicoline in improving clinical outcomes and quality of life (QOL) in PD patients on dopaminergic therapies. Methods The randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial compared citicoline (1000 mg/day intramuscular, two six-week cycles) with placebo for 24 weeks in PD under stable medications. The primary endpoint was change in Movement Disorder Society–Unified PD Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) total score; secondary endpoints included motor and non-motor subscores, QOL, clinical global impression (CGI) and safety. Results The study enrolled 485 participants, randomizing 474 (citicoline: 303; placebo: 171). Citicoline significantly increased the likelihood of achieving a minimal clinically important difference compared with placebo (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.06–3.99; P=0.031) on the MDS-UDPRS total score in the modified intention-to-treat population. Among secondary outcomes, the citicoline group showed greater improvement in motor function (MDS-UPDRS III -2.97 vs -0.13; p=0.009) and a greater improvement on CGI -II and CGI-III (3.26 vs 3.59; p=0.021 and 9.30 vs 10.38; p=0.018, respectively). AEs occurred in 21.75% and 27.1% of the citicoline and placebo groups, respectively. Conclusions Citicoline was well tolerated and associated with motor benefits compared with placebo in a highly compliant population. The results suggest a role of citicoline as a safe and possibly effective supportive therapy in PD treated with concomitant dopaminergic agents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marano et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: