Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The role of plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) in the clearance of tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) by hepatocyte-like cells was studied. Rat (Novikoff) hepatoma cells were able to bind and degrade t-PA in a PAI-1 independent fashion, but PAI-1 markedly increased the rate of degradation and t-PA/PAI-1 was a more efficient inhibitor of 125I-t-PA or of 125I-t-PA/PAI-1 degradation than free t-PA. Competition studies revealed that the effect of PAI-1 is unlikely to involve determinants located on the PAI-1 part of the complex: 1) an excess of free PAI had no effect on the rate of degradation of 125I-t-PA/PAI-1.2) Complexes of PAI-1 with urokinase-type PA or with a t-PA mutant lacking the finger and growth factor domains were unable to compete for the binding and degradation of free or PAI-1-complexed 125I-t-PA.3) t-PA KHRR296-299AAAA, a mutant which reacts 2 orders of magnitude slower with PAI-1 than wild type t-PA, behaved similar to wild type t-PA. The clearance via both the PAI-1-dependent and the PAI-1-independent mechanisms was inhibited by the receptor-associated protein, a general inhibitor of clearance mediated by the LDL receptor-related protein. We conclude that t-PA can be cleared by rat hepatoma cells in a PAI-1 independent fashion, but after complex formation with PAI-1, binding of t-PA to the cells is increased and clearance accelerated. Both mechanisms seem to involve the same receptor.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Camani et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: