Key result
Rivaroxaban was associated with a significantly lower risk of kidney failure compared to warfarin in Asian patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (HR 0.389).
Why the study?
Further evidence was needed regarding whether rivaroxaban is associated with a lower risk of adverse renal outcomes compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation, particularly in Asians.
Does rivaroxaban reduce incident kidney failure in Asian patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation compared to warfarin?
Cohort (n=47,946)
Does rivaroxaban reduce incident kidney failure in Asian patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation compared to warfarin?
Hazard Ratio: 0.389 (95% CI 0.3–0.499)
Absolute Event Rate: 0.32% vs 0.83%
p-value: p=<0.001
In Asian patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, rivaroxaban was associated with a significantly lower risk of kidney failure and adverse renal outcomes compared to warfarin.
May favor rivaroxaban over warfarin for renal preservation in Asian AF patients; extends observational data but leaves open need for RCTs.
Background Further studies are needed to expand the evidence for the association of rivaroxaban with a lower risk of adverse renal outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) as compared with warfarin, especially in Asians. Objectives To determine whether there are differences in adverse renal outcomes between rivaroxaban and warfarin-treated AF patients. Methods Using the Korean nationwide claims database partly linked to laboratory results, patients with AF who initiated warfarin or rivaroxaban from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2017 were identified. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance the baseline characteristics of the two groups. The primary outcome (kidney failure) was defined as the need for maintenance dialysis or having kidney transplantation. For the exploratory analysis in a subset of patients with baseline and follow-up laboratory results, the composite of renal outcomes, including estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) lower than 15 ml/min/1.73 m 2 at follow-up measurement, starting dialysis, or having kidney transplantation, ≥ 30% decline in eGFR, doubling of serum creatinine level, and acute kidney injury (AKI) were evaluated. The two groups were compared using Cox proportional hazards regression in the weighted population. Results We identified 30,933 warfarin users and 17,013 rivaroxaban users (51% of low dose rivaroxaban). After IPTW, the mean age was 70 years, and the mean CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score was 3.9 in both groups. During a median follow-up of 0.93 (interquartile ranges 0.23–2.10) years, weighted incidence rates of kidney failure for warfarin and rivaroxaban were 0.83 and 0.32 per 100 person-years, respectively. Compared with the warfarin group, the rivaroxaban group was associated with a lower risk of kidney failure (hazard ratio [HR] 0.389, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.300–0.499, p < 0.001). In patients with preexisting chronic kidney disease or eGFR ≤ 60 ml/min/1.73 m 2 , rivaroxaban was more beneficial than warfarin in reducing the risk of kidney failure. For the composite of five renal outcomes in the exploratory analysis, the rivaroxaban group showed a lower risk than warfarin (HR 0.798, 95% CI 0.713–0.892, p < 0.001). Conclusion Rivaroxaban was associated with lower risks of renal adverse outcomes than warfarin in Korean patients with AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (n=47,946). Rivaroxaban vs. Warfarin was evaluated on Kidney failure (need for maintenance dialysis or having kidney transplantation) (HR 0.389, 95% CI 0.300-0.499, p=<0.001). Rivaroxaban was associated with a significantly lower risk of kidney failure compared to warfarin in Asian patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (HR 0.389).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: