Key result
Evening chronotype was associated with higher depression (p=0.004) and negative emotionality (p=0.010) compared to morning/intermediate chronotypes, which was significantly mediated by social support.
Why the study?
Women are disproportionately affected by psychological distress and lack of social support, and are more vulnerable to the negative impact of chronotype on mental health.
Does evening chronotype worsen depression and negative emotionality in women, and is this mediated by social support?
Cross-Sectional (n=506)
Yes
Does evening chronotype worsen depression and negative emotionality in women, and is this mediated by social support?
p-value: p=0.004
Social support mediates nearly half of the negative impact of evening chronotype on depression and negative emotionality in women, highlighting a potential target for mental health interventions.
Women’s chronotype-mental health vulnerability warrants prospective study; cross-sectional data leave social support mediation open across groups.
Women are disproportionally affected by psychological distress and lack of social support and are more vulnerable to the negative impact of chronotype on mental health. This study evaluates cross-sectional associations between chronotype and mental health, while assessing the mediating role of social support among women from diverse racial/ethnic backgrounds. Women from the American Heart Association Go Red for Women Research Network were included (N = 506, mean age = 37 ± 15.7, 61% racial/ethnic minority). Chronotype, depression, perceived stress, health-related quality of life, and social support were assessed at baseline using validated self-reported questionnaires. Linear regression and causal mediation analyses were performed. Depression and negative emotionality were higher among women with evening vs. morning/intermediate chronotypes (all p < 0.05). Multivariable analyses adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical confounders showed associations between evening chronotype and higher depression (p = 0.004) and negative emotionality (p = 0.010). However, these associations were no longer significant after adjusting for social support (depression: p = 0.12; negative emotionality: p = 0.18). Social support significantly mediated 44.6% and 45.8% of the total effect of chronotype on depression and negative emotionality, respectively. Social support represents a potential mechanism underlying the associations between eveningness and poor mental health. Chronotype and social support should be considered in interventions for the promotion of mental health in women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Benasi et al. (2024) conducted a cross-sectional in Mental health (n=506). Evening chronotype vs. Morning/intermediate chronotypes was evaluated on Depression (p=0.004). Evening chronotype was associated with higher depression (p=0.004) and negative emotionality (p=0.010) compared to morning/intermediate chronotypes, which was significantly mediated by social support.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: