Using a first-principles methodology, we investigated the effect of diamond surface termination on the work of separation (Wₛₑₚ), interface geometry, bond character, and adhesive transfer of three Al/diamond interfaces, viz., Al(111)/C(111)-1×1, Al(111)/C(111)-2×1 and Al(111)/C(111)-1×1:H. Bond character was explored with the electron localization function. Adhesive transfer was investigated by subjecting each interface to a series of tensile strain increments up to fracture. This also allowed us to generate constitutive laws for decohesion and predict the interfacial strength. The highest adhesion occurs in Al(111)/C(111)-1×1 for which Wₛₑₚ=4.08J/m². Adhesion is due to strong covalent Al-C bonds, and two Al layers transfer to the diamond. Mixed covalent/metallic bonds form along Al(111)/C(111)-2×1, for which Wₛₑₚ=0.33J/m², and fracture occurs without adhesive transfer. Bond breaking in the clean interfaces is accompanied by a jump-to-separation process. We also find that Al(111)/C(111)-1×1 is energetically favored over Al(111)/C(111)-2×1 even though the latter contains reconstructed diamond. This suggests that the reconstruction of C(111)-2×1 is broken upon exposure to Al. For Al(111)/C(111)-1×1:H, we computed Wₛₑₚ=0.02J/m²; no bonds form between Al and H and fracture occurs without adhesive transfer. Qualitative comparison of our results with existing experiments is also presented.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qi et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: