Key result
64-slice MSCT with systematic beta-blocker administration showed excellent diagnostic accuracy for significant in-stent restenosis, with a per-patient sensitivity of 100% and NPV of 100%.
Why the study?
Does 64-slice MSCT with optimal heart rate control accurately detect significant in-stent restenosis compared to conventional coronary angiography in patients revascularized by stenting?
Observational (n=218)
Does 64-slice MSCT with optimal heart rate control accurately detect significant in-stent restenosis compared to conventional coronary angiography in patients revascularized by stenting?
64-slice MSCT with aggressive heart rate control using beta-blockers provides excellent diagnostic accuracy and high negative predictive value for excluding significant coronary in-stent restenosis.
Supports high NPV for excluding ISR with optimized 64-slice MSCT; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: Imaging artifacts due to metallic stent struts can reduce the diagnostic accuracy of multislice computed tomography (MSCT) in the evaluation of in-stent restenosis (ISR). Our aim was to determine the accuracy of binary ISR exclusion using a 64-slice MSCT scanner and a systematic administration of beta-blockers having an aggressive heart rate (HR) control. METHODS: We performed 64-slice MSCT in 218 consecutive patients revascularized by stenting. All patients were treated with oral/intravenous beta-blocker drugs in order to obtain a HR less than 65 beats/min in the prescan phase. Coronary stents were evaluated by two experienced observers in order to rule out the presence of significant (>50%) ISR. Quantitative conventional coronary angiography (CCA) served as a standard for reference. RESULTS: Five patients (2.3%) were excluded from the analysis; mean HR was 59 +/- 3 beats/min in the prescan phase and 62 +/- 5 beats/min during acquisition. In the 321 stented coronary segments, CCA found 27 significant ISRs. MSCT correctly diagnosed 26 significant ISRs, with two false-positive and one false-negative case. In a per-segment analysis, the sensitivity was 96%, specificity 99%, positive predictive value (PPV) 92.8%, and negative predictive value (NPV) 99%. In a per-patient analysis, the sensitivity was 100%, specificity 98.9%, PPV 92.8%, and NPV 100%. CONCLUSION: In our study, the evaluation of significant ISR by MSCT showed an excellent diagnostic accuracy with a PPV of 92.8% and a NPV of 99%. Selection criteria and radiation exposure can be considered a limitation of the method.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martuscelli et al. (2010) conducted an observational in In-stent restenosis (n=218). 64-slice MSCT with systematic beta-blocker administration vs. Quantitative conventional coronary angiography (CCA) was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy for significant (>50%) in-stent restenosis. 64-slice MSCT with systematic beta-blocker administration showed excellent diagnostic accuracy for significant in-stent restenosis, with a per-patient sensitivity of 100% and NPV of 100%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: