Key result
320-slice CT angiography demonstrates ~91% diagnostic accuracy for evaluating coronary in-stent restenosis.
Why the study?
In-stent restenosis occurs frequently after stenting, leading to routine invasive angiography; this study aimed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of CTCA for evaluating stent patency across different sites and sizes.
Does 320-slice CT coronary angiography accurately detect in-stent restenosis in patients with previous coronary stent implantation?
Observational (n=40)
No
Does 320-slice CT coronary angiography accurately detect in-stent restenosis in patients with previous coronary stent implantation?
320-slice CT coronary angiography is a highly accurate non-invasive modality for ruling out significant in-stent restenosis, particularly in proximal stents and those larger than 3mm in diameter.
Supports CT angiography for in-stent restenosis assessment; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
Background: Coronary artery stenting has become the most important non-surgical treatment for symptomatic coronary artery disease. However, in-stent restenosis occurs at a relatively high rate and this problem has led to the routine use of invasive angiography for assessing stent patency. Objective: The aim of the study is to determine sensitivity and specificity of Computerized Topography Coronary Angiography (CTCA) for evaluation of coronary stent patency regarding its different sites and sizes. Patients and methods: The study population consisted of 40 patients presented for follow up after previous coronary stent implantation within at least 6 months regardless presence or absence of symptoms suggestive of in-stent restenosis. It was carried out at Nasr City Police Hospital in the span of one year from June 2018 to June 2019. The study was approved by the medical ethics committee of Al-Azhar University Hospitals and a written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Results: The current study revealed a good diagnostic accuracy of the MSCT coronary angiography (91.2%). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 88.2%, 92%, 83.3% and 94.3% respectively. We also concluded the higher diagnostic accuracy of ISR in LAD compared to other vessels as well as higher diagnostic accuracy of ISR of proximal stents and stents of diameter > 3mm. Conclusion: It was concluded that the 320-slice CT coronary angiography is a robust test that can be used confidently to diagnose patients with coronary stents and more importantly to rule out significant coronary instent restenosis in patients with high likelihood of having significant ISR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abdelaziz et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease with previous stent implantation (n=40). 320-slice Computerized Tomography Coronary Angiography (CTCA) vs. Invasive angiography was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy for in-stent restenosis. 320-slice CT coronary angiography demonstrated a diagnostic accuracy of 91.2%, with 88.2% sensitivity and 92% specificity, for evaluating coronary in-stent restenosis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: