Why the study?
Does aspirin affect cellular proliferation and drug resistance in human prostate cancer cell lines?
Does aspirin affect cellular proliferation and drug resistance in human prostate cancer cell lines?
Aspirin suppresses proliferation of prostate cancer cells but may induce multidrug resistance via P-glycoprotein expression in androgen-responsive cells.
May limit prostate cancer cell growth but induce resistance; hypothesis-generating from cell lines only.
BACKGROUND: Aspirin is widely used as a preventive measure against occlusive vascular diseases. Since the age group in which aspirin use has become prevalent is similar to the one presenting with prostate cancer, we decided to examine the potential effects of aspirin on prostate cancer. METHODS: We studied the effects of plasma-attainable concentrations of aspirin (0.5-2 mM) on the human prostate cancer cell lines LNCaP, PC-3, and DU 145, employing cytotoxicity assays and flow cytometric analyses. RESULTS: Incubation with aspirin for 3 days reduced cellular proliferation by up to 35-55% in each cell line studied, but induced a tripling of the percentage of cells expressing P-glycoprotein (an efflux pump conferring multidrug resistance) only in the LNCaP cells. Both effects were dose-dependent. The effect on P-glycoprotein expression was reflected in the induction of resistance against adriamycin cytotoxicity. Furthermore, this protective effect of aspirin was reversed by a specific P-glycoprotein inhibitor, PSC833. The cellular expression of P-glycoprotein returned to normal within 3 days following the removal of aspirin. Aspirin did not affect the cell cycle distribution of LNCaP cells. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that aspirin enhances the ability of androgen-responsive prostate cancer cells to resist chemotherapeutic drugs. These findings could potentially have significant clinical ramifications for prostate cancer patients taking aspirin shortly before or during chemotherapeutic sessions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rotem et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: