Why the study?
Does direct coronary infusion of fructose 1,6-diphosphate improve metabolic markers in a canine model of ischemic myocardium?
Does direct coronary infusion of fructose 1,6-diphosphate improve metabolic markers in a canine model of ischemic myocardium?
Fructose 1,6-diphosphate does not directly protect ischemic myocardium and may depress contractility when infused directly into the coronary artery.
No metabolic protection from coronary FdP in canine ischemia; leaves open translation to other models or routes.
Fructose 1,6-diphosphate (FdP) reportedly protects ischemic myocardium. To determine whether this is a direct action on the heart, we used a canine model in which two coronary arteries were perfused at identical but reduced rates. Into one artery we infused FdP (total doses of 400 mg or 1.8 g) while the other received 0.9% NaCl. After 1 h, biopsies were taken from a normal region and the two ischemic regions and were analyzed for ATP, phosphocreatine (PC), and lactate content. In the 0.9% NaCl-treated ischemic tissue, ATP and PC fell to half the nonischemic levels. The FdP-treated tissue exhibited high-energy phosphate levels similar to the 0.9% NaCl-treated tissue with no significant differences between the two ischemic areas. Lactate levels in both ischemic areas were elevated threefold above nonischemic levels. Contractility studies showed that infusion of FdP directly into the coronary artery depressed contractility in both nonischemic and ischemic conditions. Our data show that, if FdP does have a protective action in ischemia, it is not through a direct action on the heart.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eddy et al. (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: