Key result
The Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score significantly predicted future composite cardiovascular events in patients with HFpEF (HR 1.12; 95% CI 1.03-1.21; P=0.005).
Why the study?
The relationship between the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction is unknown.
Does the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score predict composite cardiovascular events in patients with HFpEF?
Cohort (n=506)
Does the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score predict composite cardiovascular events in patients with HFpEF?
Hazard Ratio: 1.12 (95% CI 1.03–1.21)
p-value: p=0.005
Nutritional screening using the CONUT score can independently predict future cardiovascular events in patients with HFpEF.
May enhance prognostic evaluation in HFpEF; leaves open whether nutritional interventions improve outcomes.
The relationship between cardiovascular outcomes and the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score in heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) patients is unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between the score and cardiovascular outcomes in HFpEF patients. A total of 506 consecutive HFpEF patients were prospectively observed for up to 1500 days or until the occurrence of cardiovascular events. The mean age was 71.6 ± 9.4 years. Cardiovascular outcomes were compared between the CONUT score 0–1 group with a normal nutritional state (normal group), the CONUT score 2–4 group with a light degree of undernutrition (light group), and the CONUT score 5–8 group with a moderate degree of undernutrition (moderate group). In this study, there were no patients who scored 9–12, which was defined as a severe state of undernutrition. Overall, 238 cardiovascular events were observed during the follow-up period (median: 1159 days). Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that the moderate group was at higher risk of composite cardiovascular events than the normal group (P < 0.001) and the light group (P = 0.031). The analysis also showed that the light group was at higher risk of composite cardiovascular events than the normal group (P = 0.038). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis with the significant factors from the univariate analysis showed that the CONUT score (hazard ratio: 1.12, 95% confidence interval: 1.03–1.21, P = 0.005) significantly predicted future cardiovascular events. Nutritional screening using the CONUT score may be useful for predicting cardiovascular events in HFpEF patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Komorita et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (n=506). Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score vs. Normal nutritional state (CONUT score 0-1) was evaluated on Composite cardiovascular events (HR 1.12, 95% CI 1.03-1.21, p=0.005). The Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score significantly predicted future composite cardiovascular events in patients with HFpEF (HR 1.12; 95% CI 1.03-1.21; P=0.005).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: