Why the study?
Is first-third ejection fraction at rest by first-pass radionuclide angiography as sensitive as exercise radionuclide angiography in identifying patients with coronary artery disease?
Is first-third ejection fraction at rest by first-pass radionuclide angiography as sensitive as exercise radionuclide angiography in identifying patients with coronary artery disease?
First-third ejection fraction at rest by first-pass radionuclide angiography may be at least as sensitive as exercise radionuclide angiography for identifying coronary artery disease.
Rest first-third EF may match exercise EF sensitivity for CAD detection; leaves open need for validation before practice change.
To compare two methods of evaluating patients with coronary artery disease, the authors assessed the ejection fraction (EF) during the first-third (1/3) of systole by first-pass radionuclide angiography and the EF response to exercise in 22 normal individuals and 40 patients. The 1/3 EF was calculated by averaging 3--5 beats on the time--activity curve. Exercise EFs were obtained by gated cardiac imaging. The results are shown below, including the per cent change in EF with exercise (% EF). (Formula: see text) p less than 0.05 vs. normals; p less than 0.001 vs. normals; all results are +/- SD. Thirty per cent of patients had a depressed EF, 98% had a depressed 1/3 EF, and 88% had an abnormal EF response to exercise. It is concluded that the 1/3 EF by first-pass radionuclide angiography at rest may be at least as sensitive in identifying patients with coronary artery disease as the EF response to exercise.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Slutsky et al. (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: