Key result
Pulse rate variability indices obtained via the tangent intersection method showed high correlation (CCC 0.90-0.99) with heart rate variability indices in healthy volunteers.
Why the study?
Can pulse rate variability (PRV) derived from PPG signals serve as an accurate surrogate for heart rate variability (HRV) from ECG in healthy volunteers?
Observational (n=37)
Can pulse rate variability (PRV) derived from PPG signals serve as an accurate surrogate for heart rate variability (HRV) from ECG in healthy volunteers?
Pulse rate variability derived from PPG signals using the tangent intersection method is a highly accurate surrogate for ECG-derived heart rate variability.
May support convenient PPG-based HRV assessment in healthy volunteers; leaves open validation in patients and clinical settings.
This work presents the evaluation of pulse rate variability (PRV) obtained from pulse onsets of photoplethysmographic (PPG) signals. Three published algorithms were used to determine the pulse onsets: diastolic point, maximum second derivative and tangent intersection. Temporal series of pulse onsets were obtained for each method, and several variability indices were derived from these series. Simultaneous ECG and PPG records were acquired from 37 healthy volunteers to evaluate the interchangeability between PRV indices and heart rate variability (HRV) indices by the Bland-Altman method. Furthermore, the concordance correlation coefficient was used to correlate the indices. In all the cases, PRV indices obtained through the tangent intersection method showed better accuracy and precision (Bland-Altman analysis, bias ± 1.96 standard deviation: low frequency, LF(ms)(2) = -28.06 ± 72.68; high frequency, HF(ms)(2) = -68.23 ± 192.85; high frequency in normalized units, HF(nu) =-2.02 ± 7.08; LF/HF = 0.17 ± 0.71) and higher correlation (concordance correlation coefficients: low frequency, LF(ms)(2) = 0.99; high frequency, HF(ms)(2) = 0.98; high frequency in normalized units, HF(nu) = 0.97; LF/HF = 0.90) with HRV indices than other methods, and could be used as a good surrogate of HRV.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Posada–Quintero et al. (2013) conducted an observational in Healthy (n=37). Pulse rate variability obtained by tangent intersection method vs. Heart rate variability from ECG was evaluated on Interchangeability and correlation between PRV and HRV indices. Pulse rate variability indices obtained via the tangent intersection method showed high correlation (CCC 0.90-0.99) with heart rate variability indices in healthy volunteers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: