Key result
In patients with epithelial ovarian cancer, the overall incidence of venous thromboembolism was 9.6%, and there was no significant difference in VTE risk between neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval surgery and primary cytoreductive surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 0.81, p=0.390).
Why the study?
Venous thromboembolism is a severe hospital-associated complication that may worsen patient prognosis, prompting evaluation of its incidence and risk factors in epithelial ovarian cancer.
What is the incidence of VTE and its risk factors in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer receiving standard treatment?
Cohort (n=1,268)
No
What is the incidence of VTE and its risk factors in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer receiving standard treatment?
Hazard Ratio: 0.81
Absolute Event Rate: 7.1% vs 6.4%
p-value: p=0.390
Approximately 10% of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer develop VTE, highlighting the need for VTE risk assessment and prophylaxis in advanced-stage patients with extended hospital stays.
BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a hospital-associated severe complication that may adversely affect patient prognosis. In this study, we evaluated the incidence of VTE and its risk factors in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the electronic health record data of 1268 patients with EOC who received primary treatment at the National Cancer Center, Korea between January 2007 and December 2017 to identify patients who developed VTE. Demographic, clinical, and surgical characteristics of these patients were ascertained. Competing risks analyses were performed to estimate the cumulative incidence of VTE according to the treatment type. The associations between putative risk factors and the incidence of VTE were evaluated using the Fine-Gray regression models accounting for competing risks of death. RESULTS: VTE was the most prevalent cardiovascular event, found in 9.6% (n = 122) of all patients. Of these VTE events, 115 (94.3%) occurred within 2 years of EOC diagnosis. Advanced cancer stage at diagnosis (distant vs. localized, hazards ratio [HR])= 14.49, p = 0.015) and extended hospital stay (≥15 days, HR =3.87, p = 0.004) were associated with the incidence of VTE. There was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of VTE between primary cytoreductive surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval cytoreductive surgery (HR =0.81, p = 0.390). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 10% of patients with EOC were diagnosed with VTE, which was the most common cardiovascular disease found in this study. The assessment of VTE risks in patients with advanced-stage EOC with an extended hospital stay is needed to facilitate adequate prophylactic treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shin et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Epithelial ovarian cancer (n=1,268). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval cytoreductive surgery vs. Primary cytoreductive surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy was evaluated on Cumulative incidence of venous thromboembolism at 12 months (HR 0.81, p=0.390). In patients with epithelial ovarian cancer, the overall incidence of venous thromboembolism was 9.6%, and there was no significant difference in VTE risk between neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval surgery and primary cytoreductive surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 0.81, p=0.390).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: