Key result
Apixaban was associated with a significantly lower risk of stroke or systemic embolism (HR 0.637; 95% CI 0.478-0.850; p=0.002) and bleeding compared to warfarin in Japanese patients with NVAF.
Why the study?
Does apixaban reduce bleeding and stroke/systemic embolism in Japanese patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation compared to warfarin?
Cohort
Yes
Does apixaban reduce bleeding and stroke/systemic embolism in Japanese patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation compared to warfarin?
Hazard Ratio: 0.637 (95% CI 0.478–0.85)
Absolute Event Rate: 2% vs 3.1%
p-value: p=.002
In Japanese real-world clinical practice, apixaban is associated with significantly lower risks of stroke/systemic embolism and bleeding compared to warfarin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.
Apixaban may warrant preference over warfarin in Japanese NVAF; leaves open need for prospective confirmation.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the risk of bleeding events and stroke/systemic embolism (SE) among Japanese patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), focusing on the initial dosage of apixaban and patient age. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used de-identified electronic health records based claims data from 314 acute-care hospitals in Japan. NVAF patients newly initiated on warfarin or apixaban, with no prescription during the 180-day blanking period, were eligible. Patients were allocated to receive warfarin or 5 or 2.5 mg twice daily (BID) apixaban. One-to-one propensity-score matching was used to balance patient characteristics between apixaban and warfarin. RESULTS: score was 2.2 ± 1.4 and 2.2 ± 1.4 for warfarin and apixaban, respectively. In the apixaban cohort, 39.4% of patients received the standard dose (5 mg BID) and 60.6% received the reduced dose (2.5 mg BID). Incidence rates (events per 100 person-years) of major bleeding, any bleeding and stroke/SE were 3.7, 23.1 and 3.1, and 2.5, 18.6 and 2.0 for warfarin and apixaban cohorts, respectively. Apixaban was associated with a significantly lower risk of any bleeding (hazard ratio [HR] 0.809, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.731-0.895; p < .001), major bleeding (HR 0.655, 95% CI 0.505-0.849; p = .001) and stroke/SE (HR 0.637, 95% CI 0.478-0.850; p = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Our observational data from clinical practice broadly confirms the safety and efficacy results of pivotal randomized controlled trials of apixaban for stroke prevention among NVAF patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kohsaka et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Apixaban vs. Warfarin was evaluated on stroke/systemic embolism (SE) (HR 0.637, 95% CI 0.478-0.850, p=.002). Apixaban was associated with a significantly lower risk of stroke or systemic embolism (HR 0.637; 95% CI 0.478-0.850; p=0.002) and bleeding compared to warfarin in Japanese patients with NVAF.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: