Key result
A patient with a 19-year diagnosis of long QT syndrome and malignant ventricular fibrillation was found to have left ventricular noncompaction, leading to a drastically different treatment plan.
Case Report (n=1)
Highlights the critical importance of distinguishing congenital long QT syndrome from other causes of QT prolongation, such as left ventricular noncompaction, to avoid inappropriate treatments like left cardiac sympathetic denervation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports need for imaging to exclude noncompaction in long QT syndrome; case report leaves open its prevalence as a mimic.
Distinguishing congenital long QT syndrome from QT prolongation caused by drugs or a different underlying disease process is essential for selecting the proper treatment. Herein, we present a case of a patient referred for left cardiac sympathetic denervation as a last resort treatment option for her 19-year standing diagnosis of long QT syndrome with malignant ventricular fibrillation. However, based on her atypical clinical course and additional imaging studies, a diagnosis of left ventricular noncompaction, rather than long QT syndrome, was made. She left the clinic with a drastically different treatment plan and an improved quality of life. Because many cardiac and noncardiac diseases can demonstrate QT prolongation on electrocardiogram, all possible diagnoses should be considered before diagnosing a patient with congenital long QT syndrome especially with regard to the profound treatment implications and genetic follow-up in family members.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Coleman et al. (2011) conducted a case report in Left ventricular noncompaction misdiagnosed as long QT syndrome (n=1). Left ventricular noncompaction diagnosis was evaluated. A patient with a 19-year diagnosis of long QT syndrome and malignant ventricular fibrillation was found to have left ventricular noncompaction, leading to a drastically different treatment plan.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: