Why the study?
Do perioperative hemodynamic and electrocardiographic variables predict operative mortality in surgery for coronary heart disease?
Do perioperative hemodynamic and electrocardiographic variables predict operative mortality in surgery for coronary heart disease?
An accumulation of pre- and perioperative myocardial damage, reflected by specific hemodynamic and electrocardiographic variables, is predictive of operative mortality in coronary heart disease surgery.
May support perioperative risk stratification in coronary surgery; leaves open whether modifying these variables reduces mortality.
Using multiple regression analysis, we examined perioperative hemodynamic and electrocardiographic variables as predictors of operative mortality in surgery for coronary heart disease. Data were first analyzed as univariates and, if significantly related to mortality, they were subjected to stepwise logistic multivariate regression analysis. The preoperative predictor variables were: heart rate, ventricular arrhythmia and ST-T shift. The intraoperative predictor variables were: ventricular arrhythmia and ST-T shifts; and the postoperative predictor variables were: left ventricular stroke work index, blood pressure, mixed venous oxygen content and intrapulmonary shunt. When only electrocardiographic data were analyzed, the preoperative variables were: ventricular arrhythmia, ST-T shift and anterior wall infarction. The intraoperative variables were: ventricular arrhythmia and ST-T shift. The postoperative electrocardiogram did not give additional information. The common denominator of the relevant hemodynamic and electrocardiographic variables appears to be an accumulation of pre- and perioperative myocardial damage, which leads to operative mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Olthof et al. (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: