Key result
Reduced baroreflex sensitivity is a significant risk factor for cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes and serves as an early marker for cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy.
Why the study?
Reduced baroreflex sensitivity is an established marker of cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus, and glycemic variability has recently been implicated in its reduction independently of blood glucose levels.
This review emphasizes the clinical implications of reduced baroreflex sensitivity in type 2 diabetes, particularly the role of glycemic variability as an independent risk factor.
May support risk stratification in type 2 diabetes; leaves open whether targeting baroreflex sensitivity improves outcomes.
The evaluation of baroreflex sensitivity (BRS), which maintains systemic circulatory homeostasis, is an established tool to assess cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). As BRS plays an important function in blood pressure regulation, reduced BRS leads to an increase in blood pressure variability, which further leads to reduced BRS. This sequence of events becomes a vicious cycle. The major risk factors for reduced BRS are T2DM and essential hypertension, but many other risk factors have been reported to influence BRS. In recent years, reports have indicated that glycemic variability (GV), such as short- and long-term GV that are considered important risk factors for macrovascular and microvascular complications, is involved in reductions in BRS independently of blood glucose levels. In this review, we discuss reduced BRS in T2DM, its features, and the potential for its reversal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sakamoto et al. (2019) conducted a review in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Baroreflex sensitivity was evaluated. Reduced baroreflex sensitivity is a significant risk factor for cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes and serves as an early marker for cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: