Key result
Cardiac MRI successfully ruled out cardiac metastasis in a patient with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer, avoiding a false-positive diagnosis suggested by 18F-FDG PET-CT.
Why the study?
An optimal diagnostic algorithm for cardiac tumors has not been established, and 18F-FDG PET frequently yields false-positive findings due to nonmetastatic processes like inflammation and infection.
Does cardiac MRI improve diagnostic accuracy for suspected cardiac metastasis compared to 18F-FDG PET-CT in a patient with non-small cell lung cancer?
Case Report (n=1)
Does cardiac MRI improve diagnostic accuracy for suspected cardiac metastasis compared to 18F-FDG PET-CT in a patient with non-small cell lung cancer?
Cardiac MRI is a useful modality to clarify ambiguous or potentially false-positive 18F-FDG PET-CT findings of suspected cardiac metastasis.
Malignancies have demonstrated the ability to metastasize to cardiac tissue. However, an optimal diagnostic algorithm for cardiac tumors has not yet been established, due at least in part to the scarcity of symptomatic cases. Several case reports describe how the usage of ¹⁸F-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET) incidentally revealed cardiac neoplasia. This modality, which indicates uptake sites of the radioisotope ¹⁸F-FDG, allows for whole-body imaging and is often used for preoperative determination of malignant metastasis or for assessing response to therapy over time. However, findings of false positivity are often reported due to increased FDG avidity caused by a range of other, nonmetastatic processes, most notably inflammation and infection. In this case report, an 84-year-old male with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer presented a clinical course, echocardiogram, and ¹⁸F-FDG PET-CT findings that were suggestive of endocardial metastasis. Nine months into therapy, after extensive consultation, the patient finally consented to a more complete workup using cardiac MRI (CMRI), which showed no evidence of cardiac metastasis. This case report supports the utility of CMRI as a means of further interpreting intracardiac, localized FDG uptake foci in PET-CT findings, in order to avoid false positivity and further refine proposed cardiac differential diagnoses in cancer patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bilani et al. (2020) conducted a case report in Stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (n=1). Cardiac MRI (CMRI) vs. 18F-FDG PET-CT was evaluated on Evidence of cardiac metastasis. Cardiac MRI successfully ruled out cardiac metastasis in a patient with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer, avoiding a false-positive diagnosis suggested by 18F-FDG PET-CT.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: