Why the study?
Does monitoring oral anticoagulant therapy at primary health care centres compared to hospital departments improve treatment outcomes and reduce complications in patients on oral anticoagulants?
Does monitoring oral anticoagulant therapy at primary health care centres compared to hospital departments improve treatment outcomes and reduce complications in patients on oral anticoagulants?
Monitoring of oral anticoagulant therapy in primary care centers appears to be safe and effective, with high rates of patients within treatment recommendations and lower complication rates compared to hospital monitoring, though confounded by baseline differences.
OBJECTIVE: To describe how oral anticoagulant therapy is performed in a defined catchment area in order to improve the quality of care. DESIGN: Two study periods of 8 weeks were compared with reference to monitoring sites, i.e. hospital departments and primary health care centres. SETTING: The health care district of Umeå in northern Sweden, with 125,300 inhabitants. PARTICIPANTS: Patients on oral anticoagulant therapy at the department of Internal Medicine, Umeå University Hospital, in 1987 (n = 243) were compared with all patients treated in 1990 at health centres (n = 175) and at the department of Internal Medicine (n = 290) in the Umeå district. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The prevalence of treatment failures and complications was calculated per patient year, as well as the relative frequencies of patients within treatment recommendations. RESULTS: 80-83% of the patients were within treatment recommendations. Treatment failures were 3.6% of hospital patients, and 2.6% of primary care patients. Corresponding figures for bleeding complications were 8.9% and 5.1%, respectively. The differences are partly explained by differences in the studied groups, e.g. age, indications for treatment, and concomitant diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jansson et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: