Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
April 18, 2024F1000ResearchOpen Access

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Timing of Vasopressor Therapy in Patients with Septic Shock: Assessing Clinical Outcomes and Implication

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

Early administration of norepinephrine significantly reduced mortality compared to late administration in patients with septic shock (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.35-0.55, p<0.00001).

Why the study?

There is controversy regarding the timing of when each vasopressor should be administered in septic shock patients.

Does early administration of vasopressors reduce mortality in patients with septic shock?

Population

Twelve articles evaluating septic shock patients

Comparison

Early vs late administration of vasopressors

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors

HZHany A ZakiMEMohamed ElgassimESEman E. Shaban

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Early vasopressor initiation may reduce mortality and ICU stay in septic shock; extends timing evidence but requires RCTs before practice change.

Study Design

Type

Meta-Analysis (n=2,721)

Structured PICO

Does early administration of vasopressors reduce mortality in patients with septic shock?

P
Population
2,721 adult patients with septic shock included in a meta-analysis of 12 studies comparing early versus delayed vasopressor administration.
I
Intervention
Early administration of vasopressors (epinephrine, norepinephrine, or vasopressin)
C
Comparator
Late administration of vasopressors
O
Outcome
Mortalityhard clinical

Main Result

Odds Ratio: 0.44 (95% CI 0.35–0.55)

p-value: p=<0.00001

Early administration of vasopressors in septic shock may reduce mortality and time to achieve target mean arterial pressure compared to late administration.

Limitations

  • High heterogeneity in some statistical analyses due to varied sample sizes, dosages, and methodological designs
  • Exclusion of pediatric patients limits findings to adult populations
  • Unable to carry out a meta-analysis on organ dysfunction due to limited data
  • Most included studies were non-randomized and conducted in single centers, introducing potential bias

Cite This Study

Zaki et al. (2024) conducted a meta-analysis in Septic shock (n=2,721). Early norepinephrine administration vs. Late norepinephrine administration was evaluated on Mortality (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.35-0.55, p=<0.00001). Early administration of norepinephrine significantly reduced mortality compared to late administration in patients with septic shock (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.35-0.55, p<0.00001).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a75f082b59e1a4df678634ehttps://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.144976.1
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Comparison of Dopamine and Norepinephrine in the Treatment of Shock2010 · 1,940 citations
  2. 2Effect of Early Vasopressin vs Norepinephrine on Kidney Failure in Patients With Septic Shock2016 · 727 citations
  3. 3Renal Outcomes of Vasopressin and Its Analogs in Distributive Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials2018 · 31 citations
  4. 4Comparative efficacy of vasoactive medications in patients with septic shock: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials2019 · 43 citations
  5. 5Prehospital norepinephrine administration reduces 30-day mortality among septic shock patients2022 · 26 citations