Why the study?
Does low-energy shock cardioversion induce atrial fibrillation equally across all intervals of the flutter cycle in patients with atrial flutter?
Does low-energy shock cardioversion induce atrial fibrillation equally across all intervals of the flutter cycle in patients with atrial flutter?
The finding that all intervals of the flutter cycle are susceptible to shock-induced atrial fibrillation supports re-entry as the basic mechanism of human atrial flutter.
Supports re-entry mechanism in atrial flutter; hypothesis-generating from Level 5 case report and should not change practice.
If human atrial flutter is due to re-entrant excitation, depolarization as well as repolarization must continue throughout the entire atrial cycle. It follows that the atrial vulnerable period for inducing atrial fibrillation is also continuous rather than discrete. This hypothesis was examined during cardioversion of I33 patients with atrial flutter who received 280 low-energy shocks. A composite analysis of these patients demonstrated that all intervals of the flutter cycle were equally susceptible to shock-induced atrial fibrillation. The optimal energy was found to be io Wsec. The development of atrialfibrillation was independent of the state of digitalization and was not prevented by pretreatment with atropine or propranolol. These findings are consistent with re-entry as the basic mechanism of human atrial flutter.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guiney et al. (1972) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: