Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare demographic, clinical, and histological features of hepatitis C in four ethnic groups seen at the Los Angeles County/University of Southern California Hepatitis Clinic. METHODS: We evaluated 256 patients with chronic hepatitis C, with 132 (52%) receiving a liver biopsy as part of their evaluation. We estimated fibrosis progression in 103 patients with known duration of disease. RESULTS: Asians (6%) were underrepresented in the hepatitis C cohort, whereas Latinos (51%) were overrepresented, as compared with the entire county population. A history of injection drug use was more frequent in whites (65%) than in African Americans (45%, p = 0.05), Latinos (47%, p = 0.01), or Asians (0%) and more frequent in Latinos (59%) than in Latinas (26%, p = 0.003). Such a gender difference was not found in African Americans or whites. Baseline laboratory values were comparable. The amount of alcohol consumed daily was higher in African Americans than in Asians (p = 0.0001) and whites (p = 0.10). African Americans (0.077 fibrosis stages/yr) and whites (0.084/yr) had significantly lower mean estimated progression of liver fibrosis than Latinos (0.215/yr) with hepatitis C virus infection (ps = 0.03 and 0.02, respectively): this was likely related to their longer estimated duration of disease. CONCLUSION: Minorities represent the majority of chronic hepatitis C cases in the Los Angeles County Hepatitis Clinic. Asians, Latinas, and African Americans are less likely to report injection drug use as a risk factor for hepatitis C virus. Latinos seem to have faster liver fibrosis progression rates than either African Americans or whites.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maurizio Bonacini (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: