As the main water resources infrastructure in the region, the Ubonratana reservoir has played and continues to play a significant role in the socio-economic well-being of north-eastern Thailand. For such a multi-purpose system serving flood protection and various water demand needs, it is important that the reservoir is effectively operated to ensure that the overall performance of the system is enhanced. Consequently, this study has evaluated the performance of the Ubonratana reservoir with four competing operating policies, namely: (a) the pre-2002 policy (P1); (b) a post-2002 policy, following the catastrophic flood of 2002 (P2); (c) a policy derived in the current study to address the limitations of P2 in relation to water shortages (P3); and (d) the standard operating policy, SOP (P4). The simulation analyses were implemented using a water evaluation and planning system model of the reservoir meeting domestic (first priority), industrial (second priority), irrigation (third priority) and in-stream (fourth priority) needs. The performance was summarised in terms of reliability, vulnerability, resilience and sustainability. The results showed that overall, P4 was the best, followed by P3, P1 and P2 in that order. This is a useful demonstration of how rule curves can successfully guide the operation of multi-purpose reservoir systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chiamsathit et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: