Why the study?
SGLT2 inhibitors reduce major adverse CV events and HF hospitalization in patients with T2D, but their effects on myocardial energetics, cellular volume, function, and perfusion needed investigation.
Does empagliflozin improve myocardial energetics, cellular volume, and cardiac function in patients with type 2 diabetes?
Does empagliflozin improve myocardial energetics, cellular volume, and cardiac function in patients with type 2 diabetes?
Empagliflozin improves cardiac energetics and function while reducing myocardial cellular volume in patients with type 2 diabetes, providing mechanistic insights into its cardiovascular benefits.
Empagliflozin effects on myocardial energetics in T2D remain uncertain; leaves open need for larger prospective trials.
Sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular (CV) events and hospitalization for heart failure (HF) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Using CV MRI (CMR) and 31P-MRS in a longitudinal cohort study, we aimed to investigate the effects of the selective SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin on myocardial energetics and cellular volume, function, and perfusion. Eighteen patients with T2D underwent CMR and 31P-MRS scans before and after 12 weeks’ empagliflozin treatment. Plasma N-terminal prohormone B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels were measured. Ten volunteers with normal glycemic control underwent an identical scan protocol at a single visit. Empagliflozin treatment was associated with significant improvements in phosphocreatine-to-ATP ratio (1.52 to 1.76, P = 0.009). This was accompanied by a 7% absolute increase in the mean left ventricular ejection fraction (P = 0.001), 3% absolute increase in the mean global longitudinal strain (P = 0.01), 8 mL/m2 absolute reduction in the mean myocardial cell volume (P = 0.04), and 61% relative reduction in the mean NT-proBNP (P = 0.05) from baseline measurements. No significant change in myocardial blood flow or diastolic strain was detected. Empagliflozin thus ameliorates the “cardiac energy-deficient” state, regresses adverse myocardial cellular remodeling, and improves cardiac function, offering therapeutic opportunities to prevent or modulate HF in T2D.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thirunavukarasu et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: