Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CeF 3 and CeF 3:Tb 3+ nanoparticles were prepared by reverse microemulsion with a functional monomer, methyl methacrylate (MMA), as the oil phase, and CeF 3:Tb 3+ /poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) nanocomposites were obtained via polymerization of the MMA monomer. The nanoparticles and nanocomposites have been well characterized by X−ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), low- and high-resolution transmission electron microscope (TEM), selected-area electron diffraction (SAED), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), UV/vis transmission spectra, photoluminescence excitation, and emission spectra and luminescence decays. The well-crystallized CeF 3 and CeF 3:Tb 3+ nanoparticles are spherical with a mean diameter of 15 nm. They show the characteristic emission of Ce 3+ 5d-4f (313 nm, 2 D- 2 F 5/2; 323 nm, 2 D- 2 F 7/2 ) and Tb 3+ 5 D 4 - 7 F J ( J = 6−3, with 5 D 4 - 7 F 5 green emission at 541 nm as the strongest one) transitions, respectively. The energy transfer from Ce 3+ to Tb 3+ was investigated in CeF 3:Tb 3+ nanoparticles in detail. The obtained solid CeF 3:Tb 3+ /PMMA nanocomposites are highly transparent (in the visible spectral range) and exhibit strong green photoluminescence upon UV excitation, due to the integration of luminescent CeF 3:Tb 3+ nanoparticles. The luminescent lifetime of Tb 3+ is determined to be 4.1 ms in the nanocomposite.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chai et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: