Why the study?
Does the incidental discovery of coronary artery calcification on routine thoracic CT correlate with clinical evidence of coronary artery disease in patients 40 years of age or older?
Does the incidental discovery of coronary artery calcification on routine thoracic CT correlate with clinical evidence of coronary artery disease in patients 40 years of age or older?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Incidental discovery of coronary artery calcification on routine thoracic CT is strongly associated with clinical coronary artery disease, particularly in patients under 60 years of age, warranting further cardiovascular evaluation.
In a study of 100 unselected patients forty years of age or older, routine CT of the thorax demonstrated coronary artery calcification in 41%. Calcification of the left anterior descending was most common, occurring in 34%. For patients 60 years of age and over, clinical evidence of coronary artery disease was 1.7 times more common in those with calcification compared to those without; however, for patients under 60, coronary artery disease was 5.5 times more common in those with calcification than those without. Because of the strong relationship that is known to exist between coronary artery calcification and coronary arteriosclerosis, we believe that the incidental discovery of coronary artery calcification on routine CT of the thorax has significance. All patients under 60 with coronary artery calcification discovered on CT should be investigated for hyperlipidemia if this has not been done, and, if they are not known to have a history of coronary artery disease, they should have a stress test and, if positive, arteriography may be warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Woodring et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: