This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Objective Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is common and frequently challenging to treat. Anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) techniques show promise but can be technically demanding. ARMS with banding (ARMS-B) is a variant of the technique and uses a standard banding kit to apply bands in a crescentic fashion to the cardia to induce scarring. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of this novel procedure. Design/methods This was a single-centre, prospective cohort study. Patients with proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-refractory, symptomatic GORD confirmed on ambulatory pH monitoring were eligible. Repeat pH monitoring was performed at 3 months. Primary outcomes included change in acid exposure time (AET), gastro-oesophageal reflux disease health-related quality of life (GORD-HQRL) scores and adverse events. Secondary outcomes included change in PPI usage and procedure time. Results 13 patients were included in the final analysis (69.2% women; mean age 51.3 years, mean body mass index 22.9). Median follow-up duration was 6.3 months (3.5–24). Post treatment, AET normalised in 60% (9.9% vs 5.2%, 95% CI (1.01 to 8.3), p=0.02) and GORD-HQRL scores normalised in 54.5% (34.7 vs 22.3, 95% CI (1.7 to 23), p=0.03). 46.2% of patients ceased or reduced the dose of their PPI at 3 months. No complications were reported in early or late follow-up. Conclusion This pilot study demonstrates that ARMS-B is both safe and effective for the treatment of GORD. The procedure led to significant reductions in AET, GORD-HRQL, symptom control and PPI usage. Further studies with larger cohorts and longer follow-up periods are warranted to confirm these findings.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Judge et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: