Why the study?
Deep learning detects cardiovascular disorders from ECG signals, but questions remain regarding the robustness of these methods to physiological ECG noise.
Does training a convolutional neural network on noisy ECG data improve its robustness to physiological ECG noise compared to training on clean data?
Does training a convolutional neural network on noisy ECG data improve its robustness to physiological ECG noise compared to training on clean data?
Including physiological noise in the training data of deep learning models for ECG classification significantly improves their robustness and generalizability to unseen data.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Physiological noise may impair deep learning ECG classification; leaves open optimal preprocessing strategies for clinical use.
The electrocardiogram (ECG) is one of the most widespread diagnostic tools in healthcare and supports the diagnosis of cardiovascular disorders. Deep learning methods are a successful and popular technique to detect indications of disorders from an ECG signal. However, there are open questions around the robustness of these methods to various factors, including physiological ECG noise. In this study we generate clean and noisy versions of an ECG dataset before applying Symmetric Projection Attractor Reconstruction (SPAR) and scalogram image transformations. A pretrained convolutional neural network is trained using transfer learning to classify these image transforms. For the clean ECG dataset, F1 scores for SPAR attractor and scalogram transforms were 0.70 and 0.79, respectively, and the scores decreased by less than 0.05 for the noisy ECG datasets. Notably, when the network trained on clean data was used to classify the noisy datasets, performance decreases of up to 0.18 in F1 scores were seen. However, when the network trained on the noisy data was used to classify the clean dataset, the performance decrease was less than 0.05. We conclude that physiological ECG noise impacts classification using deep learning methods and careful consideration should be given to the inclusion of noisy ECG signals in the training data when developing supervised networks for ECG classification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Venton et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: