:In the early 1980s, widespread concern over the social conditions of inner-city neighborhoods gave rise to a literature on the “underclass.” A team of researchers led by Isabelle Sawhill, then of the Urban Institute, crafted a controversial operational definition of the underclass and found a rapid rise in the number of neighborhoods classifying as underclass in the 1970s and, to a lesser extent, in the 1980s ( Mincy and Wiener 1993 Mincy, Ronald B., and Susan J. Wiener. 1993. The underclass in the 1980s: Changing concepts, constant reality. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute. [Google Scholar]; Ricketts and Mincy 1990 Ricketts, Erol R., and Ronald B. Mincy. 1990. Growth of the underclass: 1970 to 1980. The Journal of Human Resources 25: 137–45.[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]; Ricketts and Sawhill 1988 Ricketts, Erol R., and Isabel V. Sawhill. 1988. Defining and measuring the underclass. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 7: 316–25.[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]). The increasing prevalence of the underclass was linked to the increasing spatial concentration of poverty ( Wilson 1987 Wilson, William Julius. 1987. The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.[Crossref] , [Google Scholar]). However, the concentration of poverty decreased in the 1990s ( Jargowsky 2003 Jargowsky, Paul A. 2003. Stunning progress, hidden problems: The dramatic decline of concentrated poverty in the 1990s. Living Cities Census Series, Center on Urban and Metropolitan Studies. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution. [Google Scholar]; Kingsley and Pettit 2003 Kingsley, G. Thomas, and Kathryn L. S. Pettit. 2003. Concentrated poverty: A change in course. In Neighborhood change in urban America, No. 2. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute. [Google Scholar]). This article reexamines the underclass measure in light of the change in concentrated poverty and finds a dramatic decline in the number of underclass neighborhoods in the 1990s.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jargowsky et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: