Why the study?
Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy increase long-term cardiometabolic and heart failure risk, but predictors of reduced postpartum exercise capacity in participants with normotensive versus preeclamptic pregnancies required identification.
Does preeclampsia with persistent postpartum hypertension reduce postpartum exercise capacity compared to normotensive pregnancy?
Does preeclampsia with persistent postpartum hypertension reduce postpartum exercise capacity compared to normotensive pregnancy?
Persistent postpartum hypertension following preeclampsia is associated with reduced exercise capacity and exercise-induced diastolic dysfunction, identifying a phenotype at higher risk for future cardiovascular disease.
Exercise capacity assessment may flag early HF risk after preeclampsia; hypothesis-generating in observational data and needs prospective trials.
BACKGROUND: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are associated with increased long-term risk for cardiometabolic risk factors (chronic hypertension [HTN], obesity, diabetes) and heart failure. Exercise capacity is a known predictor of heart failure in patients with normal resting cardiac filling pressures. In this prospective observational cohort study, we sought to identify predictors of reduced postpartum exercise capacity in participants with normotensive vs preeclamptic pregnancies. METHODS: Preeclampsia (PreE) and normotensive subjects were enrolled to undergo bedside echocardiography within 48 hours of delivery, and rest/exercise echocardiography 12 weeks postpartum. RESULTS: Recruited subjects (n = 68) were grouped according to their blood pressure as: a) normotensive pregnancy n = 15; b) PreE with normotensive postpartum (PreE-Resolved, n = 36); c) PreE with persistent postpartum HTN (PreE-HTN, n = 17). At enrollment, a significantly higher percentage of subjects in the PreE-HTN group were Black. Compared to normotensive and PreE-Resolved subjects, those with PreE-HTN demonstrated higher resting systolic blood pressure (SBP, 112 [normotensive] vs 112 [PreE-Resolved] vs 134 [PreE-HTN], P < .001) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP, 70.0 vs 72.5 vs 85.0, P < .001), and significantly less postpartum weight loss (9.6% vs 13.6% vs 3.8%, P < .001). Following Bruce protocol stress testing, PreE-HTN subjects demonstrated achieved significantly lower exercise duration (10.4 vs 10.2 vs 7.9 minutes, P = .001). Subjects with PreE-HTN also demonstrated evidence of exercise-induced diastolic dysfunction as assessed by peak exercise lateral e' (18.0 vs 18.0 vs 13.5, P = .045) and peak exercise tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TR Vm, 2.4 vs 3.0 vs 3.1, P = 0.045). Exercise duration was negatively associated with gravidity (R = -0.27, P = .029) and postpartum LV mass index (R = -0.45, P < .001), resting average E/e' (R = -0.51, P < .001), BMI (R = -0.6, P < .001) and resting SBP (R = -0.51, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Postpartum exercise stress testing capacity is related to readily available clinical markers including pregnancy factors, echocardiographic parameters and unresolved cardiometabolic risk factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lindley et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: