Why the study?
Is it feasible to conduct a randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of supplemental calcium versus dietary calcium on vascular and bone markers in healthy postmenopausal women?
Population
13 healthy postmenopausal women aged 55 years and older without any chronic disease, recruited in Montreal…
Comparison
Calcium supplement group: 750 mg calcium… vs Calcium diet group: 1200 mg of calcium from food…
Design
RCT, Permuted block randomisation in six-block intervals using a web-based…
Follow-up
12 months
Authors
Loading...
Small feasibility RCT supports larger trials of supplemental vs dietary calcium; does not inform postmenopausal vascular or bone care.
Is it feasible to conduct a randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of supplemental calcium versus dietary calcium on vascular and bone markers in healthy postmenopausal women?
This pilot trial demonstrates that it is feasible to conduct a rigorous, large-scale randomized controlled trial to compare the effects of supplemental versus dietary calcium on vascular and bone health in postmenopausal women.
Ong et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: