This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
A spatial modelling approach was used to explore how a proximity limit (150 m, 300 m, and 450 m) between tobacco retailers may impact different neighbourhoods in New Zealand. Neighbourhoods were categorised into three density groups (0, 1-2, 3+ retailers). As the proximity limit increases, there is a progressive redistribution of neighbourhoods in the three density groups with, the 3+ density group incorporating fewer neighbourhoods and the 0 and 1-2 density groups conversely each consisting of more. The differing measures available at the neighbourhood level enabled our study to discern potential inequities. More directed policies targeting these inequities are needed.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marsh et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: