Why the study?
Does metabolic syndrome reduce infarct-related artery patency in patients treated with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction?
Does metabolic syndrome reduce infarct-related artery patency in patients treated with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction?
Metabolic syndrome is an independent predictor of impaired coronary patency (lower TIMI 3 flow rates and higher corrected TIMI frame counts) following thrombolytic therapy for acute STEMI.
OBJECTIVES: The metabolic syndrome (MS) is highly prevalent in patients with acute myocardial infarction. It has been shown that MS is associated with poor in-hospital outcome and long-term survival in patients with acute myocardial infarction. We aimed to investigate the effect of MS on the infarct-related artery patency in patients treated with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 116 patients who were admitted to our clinics with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction and received thrombolytic therapy within 12 h of chest pain. MS was diagnosed according to National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III criteria. The flow in the infarct-related artery was analyzed according to the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade and corrected TIMI frame count. RESULTS: MS was present in 55.2% of patients. The proportion of patients with MS who achieved TIMI grade 3 f low after thrombolysis was significantly lower than that of patients without MS (41.5 vs. 58.5%, P < 0.001). Moreover, corrected TIMI frame counts were significantly higher inpatients with MS (58.3+/-34.8 vs. 44.7+/-28.1, P =0.02). On multivariate logistic regression analysis MS was the only independent predictor of TIMI flow less than 3 (P =0.03,odds ratio = 3.545, 95% confidence interval: 1.064-11.808). CONCLUSION: We have shown for the first time that patients with MS have lower rates of TIMI grade 3 flow and higher corrected TIMI frame counts after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yaşar et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: