Why the study?
The role of anticoagulation for stroke prophylaxis in patients with AF and ESRD is debated, and uncertainties remain regarding the comparative effectiveness of DOACs, warfarin, or no treatment.
Do anticoagulants (direct oral anticoagulants or warfarin) improve stroke prophylaxis without excessive bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation and end-stage renal disease?
Do anticoagulants (direct oral anticoagulants or warfarin) improve stroke prophylaxis without excessive bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation and end-stage renal disease?
This review highlights the clinical challenge of balancing stroke and bleeding risks when considering anticoagulation for patients with atrial fibrillation and end-stage renal disease.
Role of anticoagulation for AF in ESRD remains debated; leaves open optimal stroke prevention strategies pending dedicated trials.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an important comorbidity in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing dialysis that portends increased health care utilization, morbidity, and mortality in this already high-risk population. Patients with ESRD have a particularly high stroke risk, which is further compounded by AF. However, the role of anticoagulation for stroke prophylaxis in ESRD and AF is debated. The ESRD population presents a unique challenge because of the combination of elevated stroke and bleeding risks. Warfarin has been traditionally used in this population, but it is associated with significant risks of minor and major bleeding, particularly intracranial, thus leading many clinicians to forgo anticoagulation altogether. When anticoagulation is prescribed, rates of adherence and persistence are poor, leaving many patients untreated. The direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may offer an alternative to warfarin in ESRD patients, but these agents have not been extensively studied in this population and uncertainties regarding comparative effectiveness (versus warfarin, each other, and no treatment) remain. In this review, we discuss the current evidence on the risk and benefits of anticoagulants in this challenging population and comparisons between warfarin and DOACs, and review future directions including options for non-pharmacologic stroke prevention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zyl et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: