This report highlights a specific mechanical complication (catheter entrapment) that can occur when using high-density mapping catheters alongside percutaneous ventricular assist devices during VT ablation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid risk stratification for supported VT ablation; leaves open prospective validation of PAINESD-guided strategies.
Patients with incessant ventricular tachycardia (VT), sustained VT despite treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs, or shocks from implantable defibrillators are candidates for catheter ablation (CA).1–3 Although ablation can be efficacious, mortality is higher in patients with structural heart disease owing to hemodynamic instability from anesthesia and arrhythmia induction.1,3,4 The PAINESD risk score helps to identify patients at risk of acute hemodynamic decompensation, permitting selection of those likely to benefit from intraprocedural mechanical circulatory support (MCS).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
D’Angelo et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: