Why the study?
Does atrial fibrillation and its treatment strategies affect health-related quality of life in patients aged ≥65 years compared to the general population or those in sinus rhythm?
Does atrial fibrillation and its treatment strategies affect health-related quality of life in patients aged ≥65 years compared to the general population or those in sinus rhythm?
Atrial fibrillation significantly impairs health-related quality of life in older adults, and while both rate and rhythm control strategies offer improvements, neither is clearly superior.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Impaired HRQoL in older AF patients warrants routine assessment; confirms deficits versus controls and equivalent effects of rate versus rhythm strategies.
Atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia affecting 1-2% of the population; the prevalence of atrial fibrillation increases with ageing. The condition is associated with high morbidity and mortality, as well as reduced health-related quality of life, particularly in older people. A PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE and CENTRAL search (January 2003 to April 2013) was conducted using the search terms atrial fibrillation, quality of life, health-related quality of life, older, aged, and over 65 years. In total, 572 papers were identified of which 15 were eligible, including three observational studies, five descriptive comparative studies and seven randomized control trials. Older atrial fibrillation patients (≥65 years) were significantly impaired in their health-related quality of life in both physical and mental domains compared to the general population or patients with sinus rhythm. Increasing age, being female or having severe symptoms resulted in poorer health-related quality of life particularly in the physical domain. The review also found that the current treatment of AF including rate and rhythm control strategies improved some aspects of health-related quality of life in atrial fibrillation patients but no specific strategy had a superior effect.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: