Why the study?
The study evaluated the impact of implementing multi-disciplinary protocolised care on key performance indicators and acute outcomes in surgically managed hip fracture patients.
Does multi-disciplinary protocolised care improve acute outcomes and key performance indicators in patients with surgically managed hip fractures?
Does multi-disciplinary protocolised care improve acute outcomes and key performance indicators in patients with surgically managed hip fractures?
A multi-disciplinary protocolised care pathway for hip fracture surgeries significantly improves process measures such as time to surgery and length of hospital stay.
May support protocol rollout in hip fracture pathways; leaves open need for randomized trials on broader outcomes.
Background Our institution implemented a multi-disciplinary protocolised care for surgically managed hip fractures in 2017, initiating measures pre-operatively to provide early access to surgery, and post-operatively to ensure early mobilisation and smooth transition to step down care. Objectives Key performance indicators (time to admission and time to surgery) and acute outcomes (length of stay, discharge disposition and inpatient mortality) were evaluated to determine the impact of multi-disciplinary protocolised care on surgically managed hip fracture patients. Methods 935 patients in the POST-PROTOCOL group (between February 2017 to January 2020) were compared with 701 patients in the PRE-PROTOCOL group (between January 2015 to January 2017) in terms of key performance indicators and acute outcomes. Results In the POST-PROTOCOL group, a higher proportion were of ASA class III and IV ( p = .026). More patients in the POST-PROTOCOL group were admitted to the ward within 4 hours (97.2% vs 86.0%; p < .001) and operated on within 48 hours (56.4% vs 36.8%; p < .001). Mean length of stay was shorter in the POST-PROTOCOL group (11.2 ± 9.0 vs 14.8 ± 13.0 days; 95% CI, 2.5 to 4.7; p < .001), with more patients discharged within 9 days (55.6% vs 43.2%; p < .001). Inpatient mortality rate was similar ( p = .213). Conclusion Despite having a higher proportion of patients with poorer physiological status, time to admission, time to surgery and length of stay improved in the POST-PROTOCOL group.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wong et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: