This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background Despite increasing antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in clinical samples in high-income countries (HICs), data on healthy community dwellers remains limited. We explored the prevalence and types of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-PE) in a HIC , Finland, comparing our findings to community and bloodstream infection (BSI) isolates reported in the literature. Methods We recruited healthy Finnish adults (18–65 years) with no travel history to low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) over the past year to participate in a clinical vaccine trial, OEV-123. All participants completed questionnaires, and for this AMR- related part, we assessed their background stool samples for ESBL-PE, carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE), and OXA-48-producing CPE. Risk factor analyses were conducted. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was performed in isolates to assess sequence types (ST), co-resistance, and virulence factors. Results Among 738 volunteers, 33 (4.5%) were colonised with ESBL-PE, all identified as Escherichia coli. Previous residence in a low- and middle-income country (LMIC) was identified as a risk factor. No CPE or CPE/OXA-48 strains were detected. The most common STs were ST131 and ST38. Compared to ESBL-PE isolates from Norwegian BSI data, our community samples had a lower prevalence of ST131 (13.8% versus 58.8% in 2017). WGS revealed high antimicrobial resistance gene (ARG) frequencies against quinolones (82.8%) and aminoglycosides (69.0%). Virulence gene/pathotype analysis identified 44.8% of the ESBL- E. coli as extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC), 55.2% as uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC), and 10.3% as diarrhoeagenic E. coli (DEC). Conclusions We estimated a background prevalence of 4.5% for ESBL-PE among individuals aged 18–65 years in Finland. The combination of low prevalence and high ST diversity suggests low transmission rates and no endemically circulating clones.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nousiainen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: