Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVES: Discrimination and bias in clinical training often take the form of microaggressions, which, albeit unintentional, are detrimental to the learning environment and well-being of students. Although there are a few reports of medical schools training students to respond to microaggressions, none have included a complementery student-led faculty training module. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a case-based approach to improving student resilience and increasing faculty awareness of microaggressions in the clinical setting. METHODS: We created four realistic cases of microaggressions and uncomfortable conversations, based on students' experiences on the wards, to implement training for incoming third-year students and their core faculty. Standardized patients were trained to effectively portray discriminatory faculty, residents, and patients. Institutional review board-approved surveys were administered and statistically analyzed to evaluate for efficacy. RESULTS: 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This approach had results similar to other studies, with the additional benefit of training faculty with the same scenarios. We believe that this method helped bridge the gap between students' notions of discrimination and faculty understanding of microaggressions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumnick et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: