Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Fifty-five consecutive cases of surgically proved splenic injuries were evaluated with computed tomography (CT). CT permitted correct identification of 54 splenic injuries, with one false-negative and three false-positive cases. In the single false-negative case and in two of the three false-positive cases, CT scans correctly indicated the presence of a large hemoperitoneum and other abdominal visceral lacerations and so correctly indicated the need for surgery. Of the 55 proved cases, CT demonstrated hemoperitoneum in 54 (98%), perisplenic clot in 47 (85%), splenic laceration in 39 (71%), and subcapsular hematoma in 13 (24%). Perisplenic clot can be distinguished from lysed blood in the peritoneal cavity and is a sensitive and specific sign of splenic trauma, even in the absence of visible splenic laceration. The authors conclude that CT is a highly reliable means of evaluating splenic trauma.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Federle et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: