Traditionnal rulers in question. Chieftaincy always represented a major political force in Niger. The colonial administration first, civilian and military rulers later, were compelled to take into account such a reality. Through changes in the chiefs’ appointment procedures, the state has been attemping to increase its control, with a risk that this may weaken its legitimacy and the instrumental value of preexisting alliance patterns.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Souleymane Abba (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: