Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Water-saturated CO₂ (wsCO₂) injection is a novel technology that provides better CO₂ storage compared to pure CO₂ injection, due to the superior sweep efficiency of wsCO₂ injection. Previous wsCO 2 injection studies investigated only into sandstones, which have homogeneous pore size distribution . However, wsCO 2 injection into carbonate rock should also be investigated because its substantial heterogeneity hinders sweep efficiency. In this study, we use an Indiana limestone core and classify its pores by diameter: large (>200 μm), medium (21–200 μm), and small (<21 μm). The core is saturated with brine first, then oil -in the form of either pure decane (C 10 ) or crude oil - is injected to reduce water saturation. Subsequently, injections of 16 pore volumes (PVs) of either pure CO₂ or wsCO₂ are performed under near-miscible conditions (70 °C and 12 MPa). When C 10 is used, wsCO 2 injection and pure CO 2 injection are found to have similar CO 2 stored, oil recovery and pressure difference. But when crude oil is used, wsCO 2 injection yields additional CO 2 stored (3%–8.8%) and oil recovery (5%–14%), and greater pressure difference (19–36 times) than does pure CO 2 injection. This study observes that wsCO 2 injection creates emulsion because water vapor from wsCO 2 might be condensed into the oil phase, which consequently increases both flow resistance and pressure difference. Additionally, pure CO 2 could only enter large and medium pores (>21 μm), whereas wsCO 2 was able to enter pores up to 10 times smaller.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yin et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: