Why the study?
Is transtelephonic exercise monitoring safe for patients participating in outpatient cardiac rehabilitation programs?
Is transtelephonic exercise monitoring safe for patients participating in outpatient cardiac rehabilitation programs?
Transtelephonic exercise monitoring for outpatient cardiac rehabilitation appears safe, with a low rate of non-fatal cardiovascular complications occurring primarily in high-risk older patients at tandem facilities.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Low event rate supports safety of transtelephonic monitoring in outpatient rehab; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
Cardiovascular complications of patients utilizing transtelephonic exercise monitoring (TEM) was determined by age, site (home of satellite), and risk stratification. The TEM complications were compared to those observed in traditional hospital outpatient cardiac rehabilitation programs. Survey data were obtained on 786 TEM patients (492 males, 294 females) who amassed a total of 23,551 patientexercise hours. Ninety three patients were considered high-risk according to American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation guidelines. The majority of participating hospitals (75%) monitored patients only from home. Twenty-nine cardiovascular complications were observed: 21 at rural (tandem) facilities and eight at home. These included angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmias, and hypoglycemia. The cardiovascular complication rate averaged one event per 812 patient exercise hours. There were no fatalities and only one patient required emergency transport. All tandem site complications occurred in those >65 years of age while 89% of all complications were observed in high-risk patients. It was concluded that high-risk patients >65 years of age who exercise at tandem medical facilities are most likely to experience cardiovascular complications during TEM. However, given the absence of fatalities, TEM appears to be safe regardless of risk stratification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sparks et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: