Why the study?
Does a high intensity aerobic exercise program improve muscle function and cardiorespiratory fitness in severely fatigued individuals with post-polio syndrome?
Does a high intensity aerobic exercise program improve muscle function and cardiorespiratory fitness in severely fatigued individuals with post-polio syndrome?
Severely fatigued individuals with post-polio syndrome cannot adhere to a high-intensity aerobic exercise program on a cycle ergometer, and the intervention did not improve lower extremity muscle function or cardiorespiratory fitness.
High-intensity aerobic exercise lacks efficacy in PPS; challenges exercise recommendations and highlights adherence barriers for future neuromuscular trials.
OBJECTIVE: To explore reasons for the lack of efficacy of a high intensity aerobic exercise program in post-polio syndrome (PPS) on cardiorespiratory fitness by evaluating adherence to the training program and effects on muscle function. DESIGN: A process evaluation using data from an RCT. PATIENTS: Forty-four severely fatigued individuals with PPS were randomized to exercise therapy (n = 22) or usual care (n = 22). METHODS: Participants in the exercise group were instructed to exercise 3 times weekly for 4 months on a bicycle ergometer (60-70% heart rate reserve). RESULTS: The attendance rate was high (median 89%). None of the participants trained within the target heart rate range during >75% of the designated time. Instead, participants exercised at lower intensities, though still around the anaerobic threshold (AT) most of the time. Muscle function did not improve in the exercise group. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that severely fatigued individuals with PPS cannot adhere to a high intensity aerobic exercise program on a cycle ergometer. Despite exercise intensities around the AT, lower extremity muscle function nor cardiorespiratory fitness improved. Improving the aerobic capacity in PPS is difficult through exercise primarily focusing on the lower extremities, and may require a more individualized approach, including the use of other large muscle groups instead. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands National Trial Register NTR1371.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Voorn et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: