Why the study?
Does pacemaker treatment prevent cerebral attacks in patients with Adams-Stokes syndrome caused by sinoatrial block?
Does pacemaker treatment prevent cerebral attacks in patients with Adams-Stokes syndrome caused by sinoatrial block?
Pacemaker implantation effectively abolishes syncope and facilitates pharmacological management of concurrent tachyarrhythmias in patients with sinoatrial block.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support pacemakers in sinoatrial block syncope; leaves open confirmation in prospective trials.
Forty-six patients with syncope and/or black-out episodes due to sinoatrial block are presented. Male-to- female ratio was i to i, and mean age at onset of symptoms approximately 63 years in both sexes. Additional heart disease, especially coronary artery disease, was frequently, but not constantly, found. Twenty-five per cent had sinus node dysfunction as the only manifestation of cardiac disease. Ninety per cent had frequent paroxysms of one or several types of a wide spectrum of supraventricular dysrhythmias, which often gave rise to troublesome symptoms in the form of palpitation, fatigue, and/or congestion, but also made it easier to recognize the cardiac origin of the unspecific cerebral symptoms. Cerebral symptoms occurred suddenly and unexpectedly, and often disabled the patients to a severe degree. Drug treatment proved of little value, but pacemaker treatment stopped the cerebral attacks in all the 39 cases in which it was performed. In 3 out of 24 patients pacemaker implantation also abolished the tendency for paroxysms of tachydysrhythmias; in the remaining 2I it allowedfor maximal drug treatment which led to nearly total relieffrom tachydysrhythmias in 17.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sigurd et al. (1973) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: