Why the study?
The study was conducted to investigate the relationship of pericoronary adipose tissue with coronary artery stenosis using dual-layer spectral detector CT.
Does dual-layer spectral detector CT evaluation of pericoronary adipose tissue correlate with coronary artery stenosis?
Does dual-layer spectral detector CT evaluation of pericoronary adipose tissue correlate with coronary artery stenosis?
Pericoronary adipose tissue parameters measured by dual-layer spectral detector CT, specifically FAI40keV and spectral curve slope, are independent predictors of significant coronary artery stenosis.
May support PCAT metrics on SDCT for stenosis evaluation; leaves open incremental clinical value pending prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: To investigate the relationship of pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) with coronary artery stenosis using dual-layer spectral detector CT (SDCT). METHODS: 99 patients were retrospectively divided into normal group, non-significant stenosis group and significant stenosis group (n = 33 in each group). Fat attenuation index (FAI) 40kev, spectral curve slope (λHU), effective atomic number (Eff-Z) and epicardial fat volume (EFV) were quantitatively evaluated of the narrowest part of the lesion tissue by SDCT. RESULTS: There were significant differences in PCAT parameters on SDCT (FAI40keV, λHU, Eff-Z and EFV) among the three groups (P < 0.05). FAI40keV, λHU, and Eff-Z in significant stenosis group were statistically different from those in normal group and non-significant stenosis group (P < 0.05). FAI40keV, λHU, and Eff-Z in non-significant stenosis group were statistically different from significant stenosis group (P < 0.05). EFV in normal group were significantly lower in non-significant stenosis group and significant stenosis group (P < 0.001). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses identified FAI40keV (OR = 1.50, 95%CI 1.01 to 1.09) and λHU (OR = 6.81, 95%CI 1.87 to 24.86) as independent predictors of significant stenosis. FAI40keV and λHU had quite good discrimination, with an AUC of 0.84 and 0.80 respectively. CONCLUSION: FAI40keV, λHU, and Eff-Z on SDCT in significant stenosis group were significantly different from normal and non-significant stenosis group while EFV in normal group were significantly different from non-significant stenosis group and significant stenosis group. FAI40kev and λHU were risk factors for significant stenosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhu et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: