Why the study?
What are the prognostic factors for disease-free survival in patients with non-metastatic Ewing's sarcoma of bone treated with adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy?
What are the prognostic factors for disease-free survival in patients with non-metastatic Ewing's sarcoma of bone treated with adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy?
Multiple clinical and treatment-related variables, including gender, age, tumor volume, and histologic response, are significant prognostic factors for disease-free survival in non-metastatic Ewing's sarcoma.
Identifies prognostic factors for DFS in non-metastatic Ewing sarcoma; leaves open validation for risk-adapted therapy in prospective studies.
We aimed to identify pretreatment and treatment factors that may influence the outcome of Ewing's sarcoma family tumors of bone and enable customized therapy for future studies with a retrospective analysis of 579 patients with non-metastatic Ewing's sarcoma treated with combined adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy at a single institution between 1972 and 1998. We evaluated the prognostic significance of gender, age, site and volume of tumor, serum level of LDH, type of local treatment, type of chemotherapy and histologic response to preoperative treatment. The 5- and 10-year disease-free survival rates were 56.9% and 49.2% respectively. Multivariate analyses showed that all the evaluated factors, with exclusion of the tumor site, were significantly correlated with the 5-year disease-free survival. We concluded that the outcome of non-metastatic ESF of bone tumors is influenced by many clinical and treatment-correlated variables. In order to gain the greatest benefit from treatment, while reducing the morbidity, appropriate therapeutic strategies for different risk groups of patients should be selected. Criteria to stratify patients according to the risk of local or systemic relapse should not be based on a single prognostic factor, but should include all the variables that showed prognostic significance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bacci et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: